Changing Electricity Grid Paradigms Generate Controversy

Electricity Grid Paradigms

A New Model For Electricity Grids in The USA?

A recent announcement by the Tennessee Valley Authority (the “TVA”) concerning its decision to revise its price structure significantly for the sale of electricity has sparked a response from some impacted consumers. The controversy generated by the change may soon significantly impact utility pricing elsewhere. Public power companies and members of the public may soon address complex issues surrounding electricity consumption and equitable pricing.

Embracing a New Power Paradigm?

The TVA on its website posted a virtual newsroom interview with its Vice President of Pricing and Contracts, Cass Larson. He described recent changes in the way the public currently utilizes energy as a “seismic shift.” He argues that as a result of this transformation in the control of power generation, with more members of the public adopting renewable green energy from solar and wind source, power companies must revisit the way they price the sale of electricity in order to continue to make power available.

TVA Price Changes

Vice President Larson contends the role of the grid will likely change soon from a primary source of power generation to a “safety net”. He notes the prevailing price structure in most regions still rewards consumers who use less energy by conserving power use and by generating energy themselves. He expresses concern about a future in which large numbers of people will supply power to the grid, but a diminishing number of consumers who cannot generate energy themselves may have to finance grid maintenance services for everyone. Under current price structures, the bills of grid-dependent consumers rise significantly as green energy use increases. The TVA has therefore begun switching to a new pricing model in which consumers who use a lot of grid-based energy pay less, while those who draw upon the grid less frequently will pay more for the energy they do require.

A Backlash From Energy-Efficient Consumers

Jason M. Kibby (Walker) wrote a spirited opinion piece published on the website responding to the TVA’s position. He attacked the economic rationale underlying the government agency’s decision, arguing it embraces a wasteful, inefficient new paradigm for the electrical grid which effectively penalizes energy conservation efforts. His article also cites two additional problems: poor TVA grid usage projections and a serious TVA inflation of the current levels of solar market penetration in the region.

Leave a Reply