For the better part of his life, Floyd Abrams has defended people who have had their First Amendment infringed. This is why he is referred to as the most prominent First Amendment lawyer in America. While he has always argued in favor of free speech, Floyd Adams seems to be struggling in representing a Colorado baker who wouldn’t bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The Colorado baker has been accused of discrimination. He has argued that when he is forced to bake a cake for the couple, he is being denied his constitutional right of expressing himself. As a matter of fact, the best free speech lawyer agreed with this argument at first. Mr. Adams says that there is no doubt that the position of the baker was of conscience. However, the lawyer says that the more he gets to think about the issue, the more he realizes that there are more possibilities. He brings about a scenario of a painter. He argues whether the painter could invite people into his gallery but refuse to let in the black. He further raises another issue concerning a musician. He argues that a musician cannot invite people into his studio and yet refuse to write songs about the Muslims and Jews. He says that while the first amendment is supposed to protect a lot, it cannot protect some things.
After thoughtful consideration, Mr. Adams decided to support the gay couple that has been identified as Charlie Craig and David Mullins. This is a briefing that had been attended by nearly 100 people. This included First Amendment experts who could not find a difference between the unlawful discrimination and the protected expression. This case has been referred to as the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission No.16-111. The case will be brought before the Supreme Court this month. This is a case that has tested the commitments that come along with free speech. At the same time, it succeeded in dividing old allies. For instance, there was Eugene Volokh who is considered as the leading First Amendment lawyer in America. Back in 2013, he argued in a Los Angeles court that he supported a photographer who refused to document a same-sex union. He argued that painters, actors, singers, writers, and photographers should be allowed to make their choices on whom they support in these issues. They should also be allowed to reject some beliefs.